Legal Opinion

Reed Paper Co. v. Procter & Gamble Distributing Co.

District Court, D. Maine

Decided October 7, 1992No. Civ. No. 91-272-P-CPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION OBJECTING TO PLAINTIFF’S PROPOSED RULE 32(a)(2) USE OF DEPOSITION TRANSCRIPTS OF WITNESSES BENNETT, HUGHES, AND LUCIANO

GENE CARTER, Chief Judge.

The Court has before it for decision at this time Defendant’s Motion Objecting to Plaintiff’s proposed use of deposition transcripts of John Bennett, Thomas Hughes, and Debra Luciano pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 32(a)(2) (Docket No. 58). The matter has been briefed by Defendant. The Court has heard counsel on the motion. At the hearing, Plaintiff’s counsel waived written…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Krauss v. Erie R. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1954
  2. Rubin v. General Tire & Rubber Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1955
  3. Independent Productions Corp v. Loew's, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1959
  4. Terry v. Modern WoodmenDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1972
  5. Atlantic Cape Fisheries v. Hartford Fire Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1975

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. In re Honda American Motor Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1996
  2. United States v. Afram Lines (USA), Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 1994
  3. AngioDynamics, Inc. v. Biolitec AGDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2014
  4. Illinois Cent. R. Co. v. WintersMississippi Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Globe Savings Bank v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API