AngioDynamics, Inc. v. Biolitec AG
District Court, D. Massachusetts
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S MOTIONS FOR SANCTIONS (Dkts. No. 327, 350 & 359)
PONSOR, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff has filed two motions, each pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 37, seeking sanctions and entry of default judgment based on Defendants’ continuing failure to comply with their discovery obligations. (Dkt. Nos. 327 & 350.) Plaintiff has also filed a motion for default judgment arising from Defendants’ refusal to adhere to this court’s preliminary injunction and order of contempt. (Dkt. No. 359.) Because Defendants’ misconduct during the course of discovery has…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- National Hockey League v. Metropolitan Hockey Club, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Televideo Systems, Inc. K. Philip Hwang C. Gemma Hwang v. Fred P. Heidenthal, Individually and Dba South Harbor Investors and West Cliff SecuritiesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Hovey v. ElliottSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Louis M. Damiani, M.D. v. Rhode Island HospitalCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1983
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- AngioDynamics, Inc. v. Biolitec AGCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2015
- AngioDynamics, Inc. v. Biolitec AGDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2014
- Ezenia! Inc. v. Nguyen (In re Ezenia! Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Hampshire · 2015
- McCabe v. Capital Mercury ApparelDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- AngioDynamics, Inc. v. Biolitec AGDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.