Legal Opinion
Krauss v. Erie R. Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 19, 1954PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WEINFELD, District Judge.
The defendant moves under Rule 30(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. to vacate a notice to examine the defendant through the manager of its claim department and its chief surgeon, who is the head of its medical department, on the ground that neither is an officer, director, or managing agent. The determination of the motion turns on whether or not either is a managing agent within the contemplation of Rule 26, since it is conceded they are not officers or directors of the defendant.
The action is brought under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Taylor v. Granite State Provident Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
- Cohen v. Pennsylvania R. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1939
- Fruit Growers Co-Op. v. California Pie & Baking Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1942
- Cohen v. American Window Glass Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1941
- Aston v. American Export Lines, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1951
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Skogen v. Dow Chemical Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1967
- City of Tucson v. KoerberArizona Supreme Court · 1957
- United States v. Local 560, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen, & HelpersDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1984
- Rubin v. General Tire & Rubber Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1955
- United States v. Cia. Naviera Continental S.A.District Court, S.D. New York · 1959
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.