Johnson v. Stackhouse Oldsmobile, Inc.
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDuncan, J.
The sole question presented by the parties for our determination is whether the trial court erred in instructing the jury that it could award punitive damages upon the basis of a finding of malice by the greater weight of the evidence. We believe that such instruction was correct.
In Roberts v. Mason (1859), 10 Ohio St. 277, this court stated in the first paragraph of the syllabus, in part, as follows: “In an action to recover damages for a tort whicn involves the ingredients of fraud, malice or insult, a jury may go beyond the rule of mere compensation to the party aggrieved and award…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Saberton v. GreenwaldOhio Supreme Court · 1946
- Elliott v. Van BurenMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
- Household Finance Corp. v. AltenbergOhio Supreme Court · 1966
- St. Ores v. McGlashenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Eutaw Ice, Water & Power Co. v. McGeeAlabama Court of Appeals · 1919
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Villella v. Waikem Motors, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1989
- Day v. NLODistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1994
- Toledo Trust Co. v. Poole (In Re Poole)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 1981
- Miles v. Perpetual Savings & Loan Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1979
- Manning v. Len Immke Buick, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1971
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.