Miles v. Perpetual Savings & Loan Co.
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
Appellant argues in its first proposition of law that the statutory obligation of a savings and loan to appraise property prior to approving a loan secured by the property (R. C. 1151.292 [G] does not impose a duty to disclose to the borrower information concerning the property gleaned from the appraisal. We need not, and do not, reach that question upon the instant record.
One who acts as an agent for another becomes a fiduciary with respect to matters within the scope of the agency relation. Connelly v. Balkwill (1954), 160 Ohio St. 430, 116 N. E. 2d 701; Cahill v. Antonelli (R. I. 1978),…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Columbus Finance, Inc. v. HowardOhio Supreme Court · 1975
- Saberton v. GreenwaldOhio Supreme Court · 1946
- True v. Hi-Plains Elevator MacHinery, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1978
- Logsdon v. Graham Ford Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
- Spritz v. Brockton Savings BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Blon v. Bank One, Akron, N.A.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
- Lauren M. Pavlovich v. National City BankCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- Miles v. Perpetual Savings & Loan Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1979
- Spinoso v. Heilman (In Re Heilman)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maryland · 1999
- Damon's Missouri, Inc. v. DavisOhio Supreme Court · 1992
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.