Legal Opinion

Eutaw Ice, Water & Power Co. v. McGee

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided February 11, 1919No. 2 Div. 192PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Circuit Court, Greene County; H. B. Foster, Judge. Action by J. S. McGee against the Eutaw Ice, Water & Power Company, to recover damages for wanton breach of duty in disconnecting water supply. From judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtSAMFuRD, J.

The action was begun in a justice of the peace court, and on appeal the plaintiff offered orally to amend the complaint by adding an additional count. Defendant filed written objections to the allowance of this amendment, and there is incorporated in the record the following entry regarding to the objection:

“This day came the plaintiff by their attorney and asked leave of the court to amend complaint by adding count 4, and adding to the accounts each count, 1, 2, and 3, as shown by amendment this day filed in writing. Defendant by attorney objects to allowance of said amendment as shown by…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Eureka Co. v. BassSupreme Court of Alabama · 1886
  2. Alabama Consolidated Coal & Iron Co. v. HealdSupreme Court of Alabama · 1908
  3. Louisville & Nashville R. R. v. AbernathySupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  4. Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. JosephSupreme Court of Alabama · 1899
  5. Bessemer Liquor Co. v. TillmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1903

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Stackhouse Oldsmobile, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Louisville N. R. Co. v. LaceyAlabama Court of Appeals · 1919
  3. Eutaw Ice, Water & Power Co. v. McGeeAlabama Court of Appeals · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API