Legal Opinion

Locklin v. Switzer Brothers

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 23, 1962No. 16780_1PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

299 F.2d 160

Harry P. LOCKLIN and Elmer J. Brant, general partners doing business under the firm name of Radiant Color Company, Appellants,

v.

SWITZER BROTHERS, INC., a corporation, Appellee.

No. 16780.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

November 16, 1961.

Rehearing Denied December 26, 1961.

Certiorari Denied April 23, 1962.

See 82 S.Ct. 950.

Carl Hoppe and James F. Mitchell, San Francisco, Cal., for appellants.

Flehr & Swain by John F. Swain, San Francisco, Cal., for appellee, Hill, Sherman, Meroni, Gross & Simpson, by Benjamin H. Sherman and Richard M. S. Manahan, Chicago, Ill., of counsel.

B…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hazel-Atlas Glass Co. v. Hartford-Empire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. General Electric Co. v. Wabash Appliance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Smith v. NicholsSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  4. Minerals Separation, Ltd. v. HydeSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  5. Muncie Gear Works, Inc. v. Outboard, Marine & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Raymond A. Chamberlin v. Forester W. IsenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  2. Rohm and Haas Co. v. Dawson Chemical Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1983
  3. In Re American HomePatient, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2003
  4. Railroad Dynamics, Inc. v. A. Stucki Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1983
  5. Application of Marion J. CaldwellCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API