Kramer v. City of Dearborn Heights
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
Plaintiffs appeal as of right from the trial court’s dismissal of this action challenging the funding of certain drain improvements and the consolidation of drainage districts. We affirm.
There is no merit to plaintiffs’ claim that the trial court improperly granted summary disposition pursuant to MCR 2.116(C)(8) to defendant State of Michigan. Plaintiffs allege that "there is a disputed issue of fact as to whether the new effluent levels in the Federal Clean Water Act actually is [sic] what prompted the Water Resources Commission to order what it did.” Plaintiffs claim that they stated a…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- City of Detroit v. WeilMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
- Michigan State v. Civil Service CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1991
- NuVision v. DunscombeMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987
- Wayne County Sheriff v. Wayne County Board of CommissionersMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
- City of Ann Arbor v. MichiganMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
3Cited by7 opinions
- Oakland County v. State of Mich.Michigan Supreme Court · 1997
- ETT Ambulance Service Corp. v. Rockford Ambulance, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1994
- De Bruyn Produce Co. v. RomeroMichigan Court of Appeals · 1993
- Elba Township v. Gratiot County Drain CommissionerMichigan Court of Appeals · 2011
- Allegheny Ludlum Corp. v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Court of Appeals · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.