Legal Opinion
Oakland County v. State of Mich.
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided July 31, 1997No. Docket Nos. 102331, 102335, Calendar No. 17PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKelly, J.
This Court granted leave to appeal in these consolidated cases to determine whether the defendants’ application of certain provisions of 1980 PA 328 violated the Headlee Amendment. Const 1963, art 9, § 29. Act 328 amended the child care fund provisions of the Social Welfare Act. MCL 400.117a and 400.117c; MSA 16.490(27a) and 16.490(27c) (the child care fund amendment).
Plaintiffs are twenty-five Michigan counties and the Chairperson of the Oakland County Board of Commissioners. Defendants are the State of Michigan and its Departments of Management and Budget and Social Services. Certain of the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Cardinal Mooney High School v. Michigan High School Athletic Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1991
- Browder v. International Fidelity InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
- Durant v. State Board of EducationMichigan Supreme Court · 1986
- Durant v. State of MichiganMichigan Supreme Court · 1997
- Waterford School District v. State Board of EducationMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Adair v. StateMichigan Supreme Court · 2004
- Scarsella v. PollakMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
- Burton v. Reed City Hospital Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 2005
- Adair v. State of MichiganMichigan Supreme Court · 2010
- Scarsella v. PollakMichigan Court of Appeals · 1999
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.