Legal Opinion

People v. Cooper

Criminal Court of the City of New York

Decided February 24, 1989PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Mary McGowan Davis, J.

On July 10, 1988, this court granted defendant Marvin *821Cooper’s motion to dismiss the information charging him with knowingly possessing stolen property in violation of Penal Law § 165.40 on the ground that the People had not met their statutory obligation under CPL 30.30 to answer ready for trial within 90 days after commencement of this criminal action. Although defendant had not previously appeared in court in response to the desk appearance ticket (DAT) issued at the time of his arrest, the court ruled that because he had been continuously in the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Klopfer v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. People v. TaranovichNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. People v. AndersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. People v. SinistajNew York Court of Appeals · 1986

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. FloresCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1991
  2. People v. ParrisAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1990
  3. People v. BarbaraCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API