Legal Opinion

People v. Anderson

New York Court of Appeals

Decided December 26, 1985PublishedCited by 292 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Meyer, J.

Although CPL 30.30 (3) (b) recognizes the right of a defendant to move, for dismissal after the People have answered ready, that provision simply preserves for the People such portion of the readiness period established by the section as remained available when readiness was originally declared, in the limited situation where "some exceptional fact or circumstance,” occurring after the initial readiness response, makes it impossible for the People to proceed. The rules governing postreadiness failures on the part of the People differ from those relating to…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. People v. TaranovichNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. Danann Realty Corp. v. HarrisNew York Court of Appeals · 1959
  3. People v. ProsserNew York Court of Appeals · 1955
  4. People v. OlahNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
  5. People v. FordNew York Court of Appeals · 1984

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by292 opinions

  1. People v. CortesNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. People v. SinistajNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. People v. LuperonNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. People v. EnglandNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. People v. BetheaNew York Court of Appeals · 1986

287 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API