Legal Opinion

People v. Sinistaj

New York Court of Appeals

Decided April 3, 1986PublishedCited by 179 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Hancock, Jr., J.

Under this court’s decisions in People v Lomax (50 NY2d 351) and People v Osgood (52 NY2d 37), an indictment which replaces an earlier one in the same criminal action should be related back to the original accusatory instrument for the purpose of determining the commencement of the six-month readiness period imposed by CPL 30.30 (1) (a). The question on this appeal is whether such an indictment should be related back as well for the purpose of computing excludable time under CPL 30.30 (4). We hold that it should be.

On November 20, 1981, a felony complaint…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. AndersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. People v. LomaxNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. People v. OsgoodNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. People v. WorleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. People v. WeirichAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by179 opinions

  1. People v. EnglandNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. People v. McKennaNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. In re Frank C.New York Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. People v. CarterNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. People v. BrownNew York Court of Appeals · 2016

174 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API