People v. Taranovich
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtGabrielli, J.
The question presented for our determination may be phrased as follows: under the particular circumstances attending this criminal prosecution, was the 12-month delay between the appellant’s arraignment and his subsequent indictment violative of his constitutional and statutory rights to a speedy trial? The County Court of Nassau County granted defendant’s motion to dismiss the indictment filed against him on the ground that he had not been afforded a speedy trial. The Appellate Division unanimously reversed this order, denied the motion to dismiss and reinstated the indictment (44 AD2d 724).…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Klopfer v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Smith v. HooeySupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Dickey v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- People v. ProsserNew York Court of Appeals · 1955
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by854 opinions
- People v. BerkowitzNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- People v. WattsNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- People v. AndersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- People v. McGeeNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- People v. LomaxNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
849 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.