Legal Opinion

People v. Taranovich

New York Court of Appeals

Decided July 10, 1975PublishedCited by 854 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGabrielli, J.

The question presented for our determination may be phrased as follows: under the particular circumstances attending this criminal prosecution, was the 12-month delay between the appellant’s arraignment and his subsequent indictment violative of his constitutional and statutory rights to a speedy trial? The County Court of Nassau County granted defendant’s motion to dismiss the indictment filed against him on the ground that he had not been afforded a speedy trial. The Appellate Division unanimously reversed this order, denied the motion to dismiss and reinstated the indictment (44 AD2d 724).…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Klopfer v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Smith v. HooeySupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Dickey v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. People v. ProsserNew York Court of Appeals · 1955

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by854 opinions

  1. People v. BerkowitzNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. People v. WattsNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. People v. AndersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. People v. McGeeNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  5. People v. LomaxNew York Court of Appeals · 1980

849 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API