Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Flores

Criminal Court of the City of New York

Decided June 13, 1991PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Lee Cross, J.

Defendant represents himself. He has moved, pro se, to dismiss the accusatory instrument pursuant to CPL 30.30 and *18630.20 on the grounds that he has been denied his constitutional and statutory rights to a speedy trial. That motion is denied.

On December 9, 1990, defendant was arrested and charged by the police with criminal mischief and possession of burglar’s tools. He was given a desk appearance ticket (DAT), returnable on January 14, 1991. On January 3, defendant was arrested on a parole violation warrant and he has remained continuously incarcerated since…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. TaranovichNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. People v. AndersonCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1985
  3. People v. FelderCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1986
  4. People v. CooperCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1989
  5. People v. ParrisAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1990

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. Kwan HanCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1995
  2. People v. BrisottiCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1995
  3. People v. BarbaraCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API