Legal Opinion

Rives v. Stanford

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 29, 1940No. 29658PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNeff, J.

The administrator of a real estate mortgagee’s estate foreclosed the mortgage. It is said that the foreclosed property was the homestead of the mortgagors, husband and wife, in whole or in part, and it is assumed for the purposes of reasoning herein that all of it was homestead. After the filing of the action, and after obtaining service of summons upon the husband and upon the wife, but before the case went to judgment, the husband died. The plaintiff revived the action as against him in the name of his administrator, and thereafter proceeded to judgment. The property was bid in by plaintiff…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Johns v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  2. Yoder v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  3. Bledsoe v. GreenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  4. Horr v. HerringtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  5. Stough v. Badger Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1905

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Sautbine v. KellerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
  2. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n, Chickasha, Oklahoma v. NathSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
  3. Deruy v. NoahSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
  4. Viersen v. BoettcherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
  5. Van Meter v. FieldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API