Legal Opinion

Horr v. Herrington

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 16, 1908No. 2144, Okla. TPublishedCited by 11 opinions

Error from District Court, Washita County; M. C. Garber, Judge. Intervention by W. O. Horr in a mortgage foreclosure suit by Lydia May Field against J. H. Herrington, F. O. Herrington, and J. M. Beal. Judgment for Beal, and intervener brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtKaNE, J.

This was a controversy between W. O. Horr, the plaintiff in error, and J. M. Beal, one of the defendants in error, over the surplus accruing from the foreclosure sale of a certain tract of land. On the 19th day of January, 1903, the defendants in error, J. H. Herrington and F. C. Herrington, husband and wife, executed and delivered to one Lydia May Field, a promissory note for the sum of $1,000, and to secure payment of the same executed and delivered a mortgage upon certain real estate situated in Washita county, Olda. On the 1st day of December, 1903, the same parties executed to the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Tallman v. ElyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1858
  2. Turman v. BellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1891
  3. Valentine v. HavenerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1854
  4. Belleville Savings Bank v. ReisIllinois Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Sanger v. NightingaleSupreme Court of the United States · 1887

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n, Chickasha, Oklahoma v. NathSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
  2. Bullington v. LoweSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  3. Rives v. StanfordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  4. Marks v. Baum Bldg. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  5. Cowan v. StokerUtah Supreme Court · 1941

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API