Legal Opinion

Van Meter v. Field

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 22, 1945No. 30063PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArnold, J.

This is an action brought by Susan I. Van Meter and John C. Van Meter, wife and husband, plaintiffs in error (plaintiffs below) against Samuel H. Field, defendant in error (defendant below) to cancel and hold for naught a certain judgment.

For many years Emma Van Meter, mother of the plaintiff, John C. Van Meter, was the owner of the property involved herein and occupied same as her home. In 1922 the plaintiffs moved into the property and continued to live there with Emma Van Meter until her death in 1933. John C. Van Meter inherited an undivided one-half interest in the property. Later, in…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Pettis v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  2. Davis v. MorganSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  3. Lehman v. TuckerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  4. Mercer v. McKeelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  5. Rives v. StanfordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Casey v. CaseySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005
  2. Mobley v. State ex rel. Com'rs of the Land OfficeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
  3. Keel v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
  4. In Re GibsonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2010
  5. Priddy v. MasseySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API