Legal Opinion
Consolidated Mines v. Securities & Exchange Commission
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 30, 1938No. 8783PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HEALY, Circuit Judge.
The Securities and Exchange Commission, under authority of § 22(b) of the Securities Act of 1933, 15 U.S.C.A. § 77v (b), applied to the district court to enforce compliance with a subpoena duces tecum directed against appellants in the course of an investigation ordered by the Commission. From an order directing obedience to the subpoena, this appeal was taken.
The appellant Consolidated Mines of California is a California corporation, operating in Calaveras County. Appellants Wikoff and Tyler are respectively its president and secretary. On November 5, 1937 the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Blair v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Federal Trade Commission v. American Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Brown v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- McMann v. Securities and Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1937
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Hannah v. LarcheSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Perkins v. Endicott Johnson CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. Arthur Young & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978
- Penfield Co. of Cal. v. Securities and Exch. Com'nCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1944
- Shotkin v. NelsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1944
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.