Legal Opinion
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Arthur Young & Company
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided September 14, 1978No. 76-1716PublishedCited by 68 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge SPOTTSWOOD W. ROBINSON, III.
SPOTTSWOOD W. ROBINSON, III, Circuit Judge:
Arthur Young & Company, a partnership of certified public accountants, appeals from an order of the District Court directing it to comply with a subpoena duces tecum issued by the Securities and Exchange Commission. Review is sought in this court on grounds that the investigative order of the Commission authorizing the subpoena is legally deficient, 1 that relevance of the subpoenaed documents to the investigation does not sufficiently appear 2 and that obedience to the subpoena…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- United States v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Hale v. HenkelSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- See v. City of SeattleSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. Morton Salt Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Oklahoma Press Publishing Co. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by68 opinions
- Roby v. Corp. of Lloyd'sCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Construction Products Research, Inc. Five Star Products, Inc. And H. Nash BabcockCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- The Dow Chemical Company, Intervening v. Dr. James R. Allen and John Van Miller, and James P. Wachtendonk, InterveningCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
- United States v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1979
- Shook v. District of Columbia Financial Responsibility & Management Assistance AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.