State v. Ayala

Tufte, Justice.

[¶ 1] Miguel Ayala appeals a criminal judgment entered on his conditional plea of guilty to driving under the influence. He reserved his right to appeal the district court’s denial of his motion to suppress his blood test result, arguing that law enforcement failed to “inform” him as inquired under the implied-consent law. We affirm the judgment, concluding the district court did not err in finding the deputy properly informed Ayala.

I

[¶ 2] The facts relied upon by the district court were not disputed. A deputy sheriff stopped Ayala when he failed to dim his bright lights for…