Legal Opinion

State v. Canfield

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 19, 2013No. 20130141PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAPSNER, Justice.

[¶ 1] Andrew Canfield appeals from district court judgments entered upon conviction of four drug related offenses and from a district court order denying his motion to suppress evidence found during a search of his dormitory room. A lack of evidence in the record makes meaningful appellate review of the issues presented impossible in this case; we reverse the judgments of conviction and remand for further proceedings.

I

[¶ 2] The district court stated that the following facts did not appear to be in dispute:

On October 2, 2012, Officer Dickerson of the Williston Police…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Lesly Cohen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
  2. State v. DeCoteauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  3. State v. GlaesmanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  4. City of Jamestown v. JeromeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  5. State v. GrafNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. PogueNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
  2. State v. AplandNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
  3. State v. AyalaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
  4. State v. CookNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
  5. State v. LittleghostNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2025

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API