Portillo Funes v. State
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
Walter Elenils Portillo Funes v. State of Maryland, No. 65, September Term, 2019. Opinion by Getty, J. CRIMINAL LAW—DRIVING WHILE IMPAIRED—DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE—IMPLIED CONSENT—ADVICE OF RIGHTS—DR-15 FORM— FOREIGN LANGUAGE ADVISEMENT The Court of Appeals held that, when providing advice of rights prior to administering a chemical breath test, police officers must use methods that reasonably convey the warnings and rights in the implied consent statute, § 16-205.1 of the Transportation Article of the Maryland Code. A police officer read in English a DR-15 Advice of Rights form to…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Merzbacher v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
- Sites v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
- Fisher and Utley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- State v. LoscombCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
- State v. MarquezSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2010
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Lawrence v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2021
- Montague v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2020
- State v. GaliciaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2022
- White v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2021
- Gonzalez v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2024
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.