Legal Opinion

Jung v. City of New York

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 28, 1947PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtE. Ivan Rubenstein, J.

Plaintiffs, who are city-employed welders, each seek to recover from the city the sum of $2,651.47 which they allege is the value of their vacations and the city’s contributions to their pension funds for the period 1938 to 1946 inclusive. Plaintiffs allege that according to certain provisions *201of law they are entitled to vacations with pay and contributions by the city toward their pension benefits but that the city has failed to accord them, these rights. In the affidavit submitted in support of their motion for summary judgment, plaintiffs admit that the city has fulfilled from year to year…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Matter of Giannettino v. McGoldrickNew York Court of Appeals · 1946
  2. Matter of Gaston v. TaylorNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
  3. People Ex Rel. Northchester Corp. v. MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 1942
  4. Jackson ex dem. Bleecker v. WiseburnNew York Supreme Court · 1830
  5. Wait v. . Van AllenNew York Court of Appeals · 1860

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Gowanlock v. TurnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Adams v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  3. Yerry v. GoodsellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1957
  4. Gowanlock v. TurnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API