Gowanlock v. Turner
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
42 Cal.2d 296 (1954)
THOMAS W. GOWANLOCK et al., Respondents,
v.
JAMES TURNER, as Manager of Utilities, etc., et al., Appellants; JOSEPH ROBINSON, Intervener and Appellant.
S. F. Nos. 18593, 18640.
Supreme Court of California.
Feb. 24, 1954.
Dion R. Holm, City Attorney (San Francisco), and A. Dal Thomson, Public Utilities Counsel, for Appellants.
Lamson, Jordan & Walsh for Intervener and Appellant.
Tobriner & Lazarus, Mathew O. Tobriner and Stanley H. Neyhart for Respondents.
EDMONDS, J.
Several employees of the municipal railway of the city and county of San Francisco, on behalf of themselves and all…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part; Dissent.
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Buxbom v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- United States v. MartinSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Adams v. WolffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Matter of Giannettino v. McGoldrickNew York Court of Appeals · 1946
- Woods v. City of WoburnMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.