Legal Opinion
Gowanlock v. Turner
California Supreme Court
Decided February 24, 1954No. S. F. 18593, 18640PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.
Several employees of the municipal railway of the city and county of San Francisco, on behalf of themselves and all other employees similarly situated, sued for writs of mandate and for declaratory relief. Named as defendants are the manager of utilities of the public utilities commission, the members of the civil service commission and its secretary, and the controller. Joseph Robinson, on behalf of the taxpayers of the city and county, has filed a complaint in intervention in opposition to the employees’ complaint.
By this action, the employees principally seek to obtain a determination as…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. MartinSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Adams v. WolffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Matter of Giannettino v. McGoldrickNew York Court of Appeals · 1946
- Woods v. City of WoburnMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915
- Adams v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Morris v. County of MarinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- People v. McGeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- Walker v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Adler v. City CouncilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Sullivan v. Credit River TownshipSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.