Legal Opinion

Sharp v. Artifex, Ltd.

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided September 30, 1999No. Civil Action 98-367PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

McLAUGHLIN, District Judge.

Plaintiffs Barbara and Donald Sharp brought the instant civil action to recover for injuries allegedly arising out of the implantation of a pedicle screw fixation device in Barbara Sharp’s spine. This Court has diversity jurisdiction over the matter. Presently pending before the Court is Defendant’s motion for partial summary judgment. Defendant requests judgment in its favor on Count II, the Plaintiffs’ negligence per se claim, as well as on her other claims to the extent that they rely on alleged violations of the Food and Drug…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. Congini by Congini v. PORTERSVILLE ETC.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Iacangelo v. Georgetown UniversityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
  2. ROMA v. PROSPECT MEDICAL HOLDINGS, INC.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2024
  3. ROYER v. DISCOVER FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API