Legal Opinion
Iacangelo v. Georgetown University
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 30, 2008No. Civil Action 05-2086 (PLF)PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on plaintiffs’ objections to Magistrate Judge Alan Kay’s Report and Recommendation of September 17, 2008 (“Report”).
I. BACKGROUND
Plaintiffs assert a variety of claims related to the medical treatment provided to Karyn Kerris. Their allegations center on three embolization procedures performed on Ms. Kerris between 1998 and 1999 by Dr. Vance Watson at Georgetown University Hospital. Those procedures involved the use of a mixture of two substances— Lipiodol and Histoacryl — injected into Ms. Kerris’ brain to…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Charles Kowal v. MCI Communications CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
- Dolly Kyle Browning and Direct Outstanding Creations Corporation v. William Jefferson ClintonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
- Frank A. Schuler, Jr. v. United States of America, Department of StateCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1979
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Rimkus v. Islamic Republic of IranDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Taylor v. Islamic Republic of IranDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Anderson v. the Islamic Republic of IranDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Fain v. Islamic Republic of IranDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- ESTATE OF BOTVIN EX REL. ELLIS v. Islamic Republic of IranDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.