ROMA v. PROSPECT MEDICAL HOLDINGS, INC.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA JOANNE ROMA et al., CIVIL ACTION individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. PROSPECT MEDICAL HOLDINGS, NO. 23-3216 INC., Defendant. OPINION Defendant Prospect Medical Holdings, Inc. (“Prospect”) moves to dismiss Plaintiffs’ Amended Complaint, arguing that their lawsuit does not present a live case or controversy under Article III of the United States Constitution, and, in any event, they are not plausibly entitled to relief under any of the claims that they pursue. Fed. R. Civ. P.…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Phillips v. County of AlleghenyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.