Legal Opinion

Norman v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided April 17, 2003No. 95-667PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BUSH, Judge.

This matter is before the court on defendant’s motion for partial summary judgment and corrected memorandum in support of motion for partial summary judgment filed February 12, 2003 and defendant’s corrected motion in limine to bar plaintiffs from challenging the validity of the government action that allegedly effected a taking in this case filed February 12, 2003. At the time of the events constituting the cause of action in this matter, plaintiffs were the owners of an approximately 2270 acre commercial/residential development in the Reno, Nevada metropolitan area, known…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Mingus Constructors, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
  5. Eastport Steamship Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Norman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
  2. Norman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
  3. Ambase Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
  4. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of Rochester v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
  5. City of Wilmington, Delaware v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API