Atamirzayeva v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DAMICH, Chief Judge.
This case is before the Court on Defendant’s motion for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to RCFC 12(e) and RCFC 12(b)(6). Defendant alleges that Plaintiff, a citizen and resident of Uzbekistan, lacks standing to seek compensation under the Fifth Amendment for the razing of her cafeteria by local Uzbek authorities—allegedly at the behest of United States Embassy officials—in Tashkent, the capital city. For the reasons stated below, the Court hereby GRANTS Defendant’s motion.
BACKGROUND1
Plaintiff was the owner, since 1994, of a cafeteria called Feruza that was…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. Verdugo-UrquidezSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Johnson v. EisentragerSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- In Re RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Ellamae Phillips Company v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- Paktin Construction Company v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021