Legal Opinion
United States v. Babatunde Nathaniel Beeks
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided September 6, 2000No. 99-2833PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN R. GIBSON, Circuit Judge.
Babatunde Beeks appeals from his conviction on one count of conspiracy to distribute crack cocaine. He alleges that the district court erred in failing to grant him a new trial, to which he believes he was entitled on any of three grounds. First, Beeks claims that his request for a mistrial should have been granted due to prosecu-torial misconduct, which he alleges occurred when the prosecutor violated a pretrial ruling that he not attempt to impeach Beeks with a prior conviction without permission. He further contends that the impeachment was itself improper…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. Adam David HernandezCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Ronald Lester JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. John Leonard DavenportCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Claude Leander RileyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
- United States v. Patricia Eileen KrappCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- United States v. Travis ZiesmanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Mark WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. BrandonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Lawrence WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015
- United States v. Muhammad AnwarCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.