Legal Opinion
United States v. Travis Ziesman
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided June 23, 2005No. 04-2042PublishedCited by 73 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GRUENDER, Circuit Judge.
Travis Ziesman appeals his conviction and sentence for manufacturing methamphetamine and for making a false statement to a federal agent. Ziesman contends that there was insufficient evidence to support the jury verdict and that the district court 1 erred in several of its rulings. In addition, Ziesman raises for the first time on appeal the argument that his sentence, resulting from the application of the United States Sentencing Guidelines in a mandatory fashion and based in part on judge-found facts, is unconstitutional. For the reasons discussed below, we affirm…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Costello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by73 opinions
- United States v. Eddie Louis DentonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. DaleCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
- United States of America, Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Rommel Smith, Also Known as Ro Sleezy, Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Jason Paul AnnisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. PrunedaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.