Legal Opinion
United States v. Claude Leander Riley
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided July 14, 1982No. 82-1092PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRIGHT, Circuit Judge.
Claude Leander Riley appeals from the judgment entered upon his convictions for violating the Mann Act, 18 U.S.C. § 2423 (Supp. IV 1980). Riley contends that the trial court 1 committed reversible error in several evidentiary matters. We affirm.
I. Background.
Claude Leander Riley left Minneapolis, Minnesota, on April 23, 1979, accompanied by his common-law wife, Velda Robinson, their infant son, and two sixteen-year-old women, Carol Richmond and LaDonna Stuhr. They arrived in Dubuque, Iowa, on April 24, 1979, and checked into a motel. That night and the following two…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. Claude Leander RileyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
- Donald M. Wingate v. Louie L. Wainwright, Director, Division of Corrections, Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services, State of FloridaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
- United States v. Patrice Mespoulede, A/K/A "Patrice Fabre"Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
- United States v. John Andreadis A/K/A John Andre and Drug Research CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- United States v. Brett C. KimberlinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- Roger George Flittie v. Herman Solem, Warden, South Dakota State Penitentiary and Mark v. Meierhenry, Attorney General, State of South DakotaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
- United States v. HicksUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
- United States v. Babatunde Nathaniel BeeksCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
- Roper v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.