James E. Decosta, Vinson D. Thomas v. The United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MICHEL, Circuit Judge.
James E. DeCosta and Vinson D. Thomas sued their employer, the United States, in the United States Claims Court 1 under the Back Pay Act, 5 U.S.C. § 5596 (1988), asserting entitlement under certain provisions of the Federal Employees Pay Act to additional compensation for regularly scheduled overtime work in excess of eight hours per day but less than 40 hours per week. 5 U.S.C. §§ 5542, 5545 and 5546 (1988). The Claims Court held that appellants are not entitled to the claimed additional compensation because the Office of Personnel Management’s (OPM’s) interpretation of…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Pauley v. BethEnergy Mines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Massachusetts v. MorashSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Pittston Coal Group v. SebbenSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- American Lamb Company v. The United States, and New Zealand Meat Products Board, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Juanita A. Rosete v. Office of Personnel ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Denise M. Wassenaar v. Office of Personnel ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- Eastman Kodak Company v. Bell & Howell Document Management Products CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- Douglas L. Ishida v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Kenneth D. Martin v. Department of the Air ForceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.