Almada v. Wausau Business Insurance
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KATZ, J.
This case involves an appeal by the plaintiff, Maria Almada, from the judgment of the trial court rendering summary judgment in favor of the named defendant, Wausau Business Insurance Company (Wausau),1 on the plaintiff’s claim for negligent infliction of emotional distress based upon Wausau’s failure to add *451cost-of-living adjustments (COLAs) to the dependent’s benefits that she received pursuant to the Workers’ Compensation Act (act), General Statutes § 31-275 et seq. We conclude, for reasons different from those relied upon by the trial court, that the court properly rendered…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Grant v. BassmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- DuBose v. CarabettaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
- Pawlinski v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
- Bennett v. Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Coughlin v. AndersonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Kelly v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- McCann Real Equities Series XXII, LLC v. David McDermott Chevrolet, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- Presidential Village, LLC v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2017
- Samuel De Dios v. Indemnity Insurance Company of North America and Broadspire Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2019
- D'Amico v. Ace Financial Solutions, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2010
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.