Legal Opinion
Bennett v. Automobile Insurance
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided August 16, 1994No. 14855PublishedCited by 49 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPalmer, J.
This certified appeal requires us to decide whether the Appellate Court properly reversed the judgment of the trial court ordering a remittitur.1 We granted the petition of the defendant, Automobile Insurance Company of Hartford, for certification to appeal from the judgment of the Appellate Court,2 and now reverse.
*797The relevant facts and procedural history are as follows. The plaintiffs, Lori Misura and John Bennett,3 were injured in an automobile accident with an unidentified hit-and-run driver while they were traveling in Misura’s automobile in New Haven.4 They brought this action against…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Peck v. JacqueminSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- State v. PattersonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Harvey v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Dreier v. Upjohn Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Nationwide Insurance v. GodeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- State v. HinesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- State v. TroupeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Springdale Donuts, Inc. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Coughlin v. AndersonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Chapman v. Norfolk & Dedham Mutual Fire InsuranceConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.