D'Amico v. Ace Financial Solutions, Inc.
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MIHALAKOS, J.
The plaintiff, Daniel D’Amico, appeals from the summary judgment rendered by the trial court in favor of the defendant ACE Financial Solutions, Inc., 1 on the plaintiffs claims of breach of contract, breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, negligent and intentional infliction of emotional distress, and violation of the Connecticut Unfair Insurance Practices Act (CUIPA), General Statutes § 38a-815 et seq., and the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act (CUTPA), General Statutes § 42-110a et seq., in the processing of his workers’ compensation claim.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Unruh v. Truck Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Young v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
- Sgueglia v. Milne Construction Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- DeOliveira v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Almada v. Wausau Business InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- D'Amico v. Ace Financial Solutions, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2010