Legal Opinion
Grant v. Bassman
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided March 17, 1992No. 14274PublishedCited by 76 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGlass, J.
The plaintiffs, Russell Grant (Grant) and his mother, Gail Grant, brought this action against the defendants, Charles Bassman, Inc. (CBI), and its president, Charles Bassman, seeking damages for personal injuries suffered by Grant while, as a minor, he was illegally employed by CBI. CBI moved to dismiss the plaintiffs’ complaint on the ground that the trial court lacked subject matter jurisdiction because Grant had applied for and received workers’ compensation benefits for his injuries and, thus, was precluded from bringing this action by General Statutes § 31-284 (a).1 The *467trial court…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Gurliacci v. MayerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Blancato v. Feldspar Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- LeConche v. ElligersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Shea v. First Federal Savings & Loan Assn. of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- DelVecchio v. DelVecchioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by76 opinions
- City of Danbury v. Dana Investment Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Bennett v. Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Commission on Human Rights & Opportunities v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. Napert-Boyer PartnershipConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
- Rummel v. RummelConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.