Legal Opinion

Peris v. Safeco Insurance

Montana Supreme Court

Decided May 17, 1996No. 95-511PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Turnage

The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has certified two questions to this Court herein, pursuant to Rule 44, M.R.App.P. The certified questions concern the effect, under Montana law, of certain terms of a motor vehicle insurance policy. Our answer to the first question is “yes” and to the second, “no.”

The certified questions are:

1. Is an insured entitled to maintain a cause of action under §§ 33-18-201 and -242, MCA, for the insurance company’s breach of its statutory obligation prior to either an adjudication of the underlying claim of the third party against the insured,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wunderlich v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State v. MummeyMontana Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Fode v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeMontana Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Crist v. SegnaMontana Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Lough v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaMontana Supreme Court · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. FreyerMontana Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Brad v. City of MissoulaMontana Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Safeco Insurance Co. of Illinois v. Montana Eighth Judicial District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Draggin' Y Cattle Co. v. Junkermier, Clark, Campanella, Stevens, P.C.Montana Supreme Court · 2019
  5. Graf v. Continental Western InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 2004

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API