Legal Opinion

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Freyer

Montana Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 2013No. DA 12-0543PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rice

¶1 This is the second appeal in this case. See State Farm Mut. Aut. Ins. Co. v. Freyer (Freyer I), 2010 MT 191, 357 Mont. 329, 239 P.3d 143. Generally, Heath Freyer (Heath) and Vail Freyer (Vail), who were married and the parents of Alicia Freyer (Alicia), were all riding in their vehicle, which was insured by State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (State Farm). Vail was driving when the vehicle was involved in a rollover accident that resulted in Heath’s death. In Freyer I, we held, based upon the language of the subject policy’s ‘Limits of Liability” clause, that there was coverage…

2Cases cited60 opinions

  1. Crisci v. Security InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Miller v. ShugartSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  3. Lorang v. Fortis InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Arizona Property & Casualty Insurance Guaranty Fund v. HelmeArizona Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Staples v. FARMERS UNION MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANYMontana Supreme Court · 2004

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Tidyman's Manangement Services Inc. v. DavisMontana Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Draggin' Y Cattle Co. v. Junkermier, Clark, Campanella, Stevens, P.C.Montana Supreme Court · 2019
  3. Kostelecky v. Peas in a PodMontana Supreme Court · 2022
  4. J & C Moodie Properties, LLC v. DeckMontana Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Abbey/Land, LLC v. Glacier Constr. Partners, LLCMontana Supreme Court · 2019

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API