Legal Opinion

Harrison v. City & County of Denver

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided February 28, 1938No. 14,227PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Young

Hugh J. Harrison, who was one of the defendants in the district court, prosecutes a writ of error to reverse a judgment in favor of the City and County of Denver, plaintiff below. For convenience defendant in error will be designated as the city and plaintiff in error, and other defendants in the trial court, so far as reference to them is necessary, will be mentioned by name.

The complaint on which judgment was rendered was styled by the city “Amended complaint to remove cloud on title.” The defendants in the action were Hugh J. Harrison, who prosecutes this writ of error, W. IT. Harrison,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wall v. MagnesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1892
  2. Clark v. HuffSupreme Court of Colorado · 1910
  3. Venner v. Denver Union Water Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1900
  4. Knight v. BoringSupreme Court of Colorado · 1906
  5. Empire Ranch & Cattle Co. v. WilsonColorado Court of Appeals · 1913

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bell v. ArnoldSupreme Court of Colorado · 1971
  2. Flournoy v. McComasSupreme Court of Colorado · 1971
  3. Vogt v. HansenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1950
  4. United States v. MulliganDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1959
  5. Miller v. StonerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1941

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API