Wall v. Magnes
Supreme Court of Colorado
Appeal from District Court of Arapahoe County.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Helm
Since one of the questions presented for determination is decisive of this appeal, it alone will be considered.
The action was instituted by appellant Wall under section 255 of the Civil Code, to quiet his title to certain premises in the town of Highlands. His complaint averred, first, possession of the premises in dispute; second, ownership in fee thereof and the assertion by defendant of an adverse estate or interest therein ; and third, that the alleged adverse interest of defendant was entirely devoid of legal foundation or right. To this complaint, an answer was filed which first *477traverse…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Stark v. StarrsSupreme Court of the United States · 1868
- Ely v. New Mexico & Arizona RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Pennie v. HildrethCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Parley's Park Silver Mining Co. v. KerrSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Flint v. Dulany & McVeighSupreme Court of Kansas · 1887
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Empire Ranch & Cattle Co. v. BenderSupreme Court of Colorado · 1911
- Mitchell v. TitusSupreme Court of Colorado · 1905
- Webber v. WannemakerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1907
- Lambert v. MurraySupreme Court of Colorado · 1911
- Schlageter v. GudeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1902
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.