Bell v. Arnold
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hodges
Bell, and the other named plaintiffs in error as minority stockholders, brought a derivative action against the directors of Consolidated Mutual Water Company, which was also named as a defendant. In their complaint, these plaintiffs allege that the directors were guilty of illegality, fraud, and negligence in the handling of the corporate affairs and finances of the water company. The demand was for an accounting and for a money judgment including exemplary damages against the directors to be recovered by the water company with the net amount, after certain expenses are paid, to “be…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Caldwell v. EubanksSupreme Court of Missouri · 1930
- S. Harold Levitt v. Edward C. Johnson, 2dCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1964
- Weiss v. SUNASCO INCORPORATEDDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1970
- Box v. RobertsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1944
- Horst v. TraudtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1908
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Destefano v. GrabrianSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
- Hargrave v. Canadian Valley Electric Cooperative, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
- Dunlap v. Colorado Springs Cablevision, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1992
- Lampe v. Presbyterian Med. CenterColorado Court of Appeals · 1978
- Uberoi v. University of ColoradoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.