Legal Opinion

United States v. Mulligan

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided September 23, 1959No. Civ. 10090PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SOLOMON, Chief Judge.

This case involves two placer mining claims of 160 acres each, both of which are located in the Siskiyou National Forest in the State of Oregon. The defendants, or their predecessors in interest, filed mining claims, entered these lands, and made certain improvements. Defendant Mulligan cut and removed a large quantity of timber which he sold to various lumber mills. He also cut, but did not remove, a substantial number of trees.

Defendant Mulligan alleges that he has discovered valuable deposits of nickel, iron and asbestos, that his mining claims are therefore valid, and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. Sun Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1951
  2. Big Six Development Co. v. MitchellCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1905
  3. Teller v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1901
  4. United States v. Paul Etcheverry and John EtcheverryCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1956
  5. United States v. Standard Oil Company of CaliforniaDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1937

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hoefler v. BabbittCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  2. Reines Distributors, Inc. v. Admiral CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1965
  3. Hoeferer v. BabbittCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API