Legal Opinion

Clark v. Huff

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 15, 1910No. 6152PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Appeal from Kiowa District Court — Hon. John H. Voorhees, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gabbert

Appellee, Huff (plaintiff below), brought suit against one Cones (as defendant) to quiet title to a quarter section of land. The complaint was the ordinary one under section 255 of the civil code. Before answer, Clark and Morey were made defendants, as successors to the right and interest of the original defendant, Cones. Thereafter they filed their answer, in which they denied the possession and ownership of plaintiff, and alleged that they we„r© the owners in fee by title from the United States. They^ also alleged that plaintiff claimed under a tax deed issued to the estate of Robert Young,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wall v. MagnesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1892
  2. Page v. GillettSupreme Court of Colorado · 1910
  3. Webber v. WannemakerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1907
  4. Whitehead v. CallahanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1908
  5. Emerson v. ShannonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1896

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Foster v. ClarkColorado Court of Appeals · 1912
  2. Carnahan v. HughesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1912
  3. Walters v. WebsterSupreme Court of Colorado · 1912
  4. Hughes v. WebsterSupreme Court of Colorado · 1912
  5. Chase v. BogardusSupreme Court of Colorado · 1926

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API