Legal Opinion

Burns v. Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 21, 1944No. Civ. 12525PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, P. J.

In 1930 Mary 0 ’Connor was declared to be an incompetent, and Joseph P. Donohue was appointed her guardian. The Massachusetts Bonding and Insurance Company as surety and Donohue as guardian executed a bond as required by the court in the sum of $17,000. Later the ward was restored to competency and, after an accounting, it was ascertained that the guardian owed the ward an amount which, with interest, exceeded $17,000. Thereafter, this action against the bonding company on its bond was instituted. The trial court entered its judgment in favor of the executrix of Mary O’Connor’s estate in the…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Christin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Dillon v. Board of Pension CommissionersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Miller & Lux Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Rosefield Packing Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Judson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Lerner v. Los Angeles City Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Walker v. Pacific Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1960
  3. County of Alameda v. KuchelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  4. City of Santa Clara v. Von RaesfeldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  5. County of Santa Clara v. Hayes Co.California Supreme Court · 1954

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API