Legal Opinion

County of Alameda v. Kuchel

California Supreme Court

Decided July 2, 1948No. S. F. 17708PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.

Petitioner county of Alameda seeks the writ of mandate to compel the Controller of the State of California to draw his warrant in favor of petitioner for an amount claimed to be due it under the provisions of section 779 of the Vehicle Code as it existed prior to its repeal in 1947 by section 18 of the Collier-Burns Highway Act. (Stats. 1947 (1st Ex. Sess.), pp. 3788-3806.)

The moneys thus claimed were paid into the Motor Vehicle Fund of the state treasury, for the period of July 1, 1947, to January 1, 1948. The amount sought is a sum “equal to that proportion of thirty-one and three-fourths…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Dickey v. Raisin Proration Zone No. 1California Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Whitley v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Dempsey v. Market Street Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Crowe v. BoyleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Ahern v. Livermore Union High School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. Select Base Materials, Inc. v. Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Younger v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  3. People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  4. County of Nevada v. MacMillenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Mervynne v. AckerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API