Legal Opinion

Harris-Lipsitz Co. v. Oldham

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 29, 1916No. 6440PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error from, District Court, Coal County; Robert M.-Rainey, Judge. Action by N. Y. Oldham and another against the Harris-Lipsitz Company. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

COLLIER, C.

This action was commenced by defendants in error against plaintiff in error, to cancel and set aside a deed, executed by defendants in ■error to plaintiff in error. Hereinafter the parties will be designated as they were in the trial court.

Defendant being a nonresident of this state, service ■of summons was had upon it by publication. The affidavit for publication, omitting caption, is as follows:

“N. Y. Oldham and N. M. Oldham, being first duly ;sworn, state upon their oaths that they are the plaintiffs above named; that they have commenced an action against "the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ballew v. YoungSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  2. Stevens v. ElliottSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  3. Richardson v. HowardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  4. Washington v. Colvin Et Ux.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Anderson v. KelleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  2. Richardson v. CarrSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  3. Rice v. VictorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  4. Levine v. TealSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
  5. Drake v. HighSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API