Richardson v. Howard
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Tillman County; Frank Mathews, Judge, Action by C. W. Howard against J. W. Richardson and another. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants bring error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
THACKER, C.
Plaintiffs in error will be designated as defendants and defendant in error as plaintiff, in accord with their respective titles in the trial court. On April 12, 1912, plaintiff commenced this action upon a promissory note and to foreclose a real estate mortgage as security therefor upon lots 24, 25, 26, 27, and 28 in the original town of Frederick, Okla., and obtained service’ of summons upon defendants by publication predicated upon an affidavit therefor in the part in question here as follows:
“Affiant further states that the defendants, J. W. Richardson and Blanche…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Busenbark v. BusenbarkSupreme Court of Kansas · 1885
- McAdams v. LathamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- Ballew v. YoungSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Klemp v. WinterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1880
- Davis v. Vinson Land Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1907
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Pettis v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Tulsa Professional Collection Services, Inc. v. PopeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
- Continental Gin Co. v. ArnoldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Corliss v. Davidson & Case Lbr. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- Davis v. RowlandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.