Legal Opinion

Levine v. Teal

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 1, 1944No. 31304PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWelch, J.

The action was brought by the Teals, husband and wife, to cancel a mortgage in the form of a deed theretofore given to defendants on plaintiffs’ homestead. Defendants, by cross-petition, sought judgment against plaintiffs on alleged indebtedness and for foreclosure of the lien of the mortgage. Jury was waived and the cause tried to the court, resulting in judgment in favor of plaintiffs.

On appeal defendants contend that the judgment is contrary to the evidence and clearly against the weight of the evidence.

Essential and undisputed facts are that plaintiff Johnnie Teal was employed as a porter…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Anderson v. KelleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  2. Samuels Shoe Co. v. FrensleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  3. Pendleton v. GreeverSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  4. Harris-Lipsitz Co. v. OldhamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  5. Rice v. VictorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Thomas v. OwensSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
  2. Lemon v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API